<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>FilmJabber Movie Blog</title>
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.filmjabber.com/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>The Tick Has Returned!</title>
		<link>http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~r/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves/~3/367396011/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/17/the-tick-has-returned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Television/TV]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[minisode]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the tick]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tick cartoon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/17/the-tick-has-returned/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone remember watching The Tick, which starred an idiotic but good-natured superhero (named The Tick) and his brainier but not quite so confident sidekick, Arthur? The show was hilarious, and while it has been canceled a few times, it never seems to die completely. The lovable superhero is back on the Minisodes Network, which takes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone remember watching <strong>The Tick</strong>, which starred an idiotic but good-natured superhero (named The Tick) and his brainier but not quite so confident sidekick, Arthur? The show was hilarious, and while it has been canceled a few times, it never seems to die completely. The lovable superhero is back on the <a href="http://www.minisodenetwork.com/" target="_blank">Minisodes Network</a>, which takes the original content, shrinks it down to five minutes while maintaining the general storyarc, and provides them for free on the Internet.</p>
<p>So, in other words, for all of you - like me - who liked cartoons growing up but don&#8217;t have the patience to watch 25-minute episodes anymore, this could be a great alternative (I&#8217;m pretty sure they have non-cartoons as well). Here&#8217;s the pilot episode of <strong>The Tick</strong>&#8230; [EDITOR&#8217;S NOTE: Having written this post before watching the video, I now see that the pilot episode is for the live-action version. Either way&#8230; Enjoy!]</p>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/y5lqA5s6oYw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/y5lqA5s6oYw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/17/the-tick-has-returned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/17/the-tick-has-returned/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 30 Sci-Fi Films According to Yahoo!</title>
		<link>http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~r/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves/~3/366723417/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/16/top-30-sci-fi-films-according-to-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[best sci-fi movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi movie list]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[top sci-fi movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/16/top-30-sci-fi-films-according-to-yahoo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the perfect example why popularity ratings cannot be used to make Top 10 Lists&#8230; or in this case, Top 30 Lists. Yahoo! has released a list of its Top 30 Sci-Fi Movies, according to its user ratings. I can&#8217;t be too harsh, though, as there are some surprisingly good entries - but as you&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the perfect example why popularity ratings cannot be used to make Top 10 Lists&#8230; or in this case, Top 30 Lists. Yahoo! has released a list of its <a href="http://movies.yahoo.com/photos/collections/gallery/970/yahoo-users-toprated-scifi-films#photo0" target="_blank">Top 30 Sci-Fi Movies</a>, according to its user ratings. I can&#8217;t be too harsh, though, as there are some surprisingly good entries - but as you&#8217;ll see, there are some surprisingly bad ones, too.</p>
<p>Number 30 is a pleasant surprise, as Yahoo! users rated <strong>Serenity</strong> as such. I didn&#8217;t know there were enough people who had seen this awesome flick to get it on such a list, but I guess there are. <strong>Serenity</strong> is one of the best action sci-fi flicks in recent memory. The list includes the ones you&#8217;d expect to be on there, such as <strong>E.T., The Empire Strikes Back, Back to the Future</strong>, etc., but there are some that clearly benefited from their recency, such as:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>X-Men: The Last Stand</strong> - this was really not that good of a movie, and certainly not good enough to rank in the top 30</li>
<li><strong>Deja Vu</strong> - a pretty good movie, but top 30 sci-fi films of all time? I don&#8217;t think so/</li>
<li><strong>V for Vendetta</strong> - it&#8217;s set in the future, but I&#8217;d question how &#8220;sci-fi&#8221; this movie really is. Plus, it&#8217;s a bit overrated, and ranks above <strong>X-Men 2</strong>???</li>
<li><strong>Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge of the Sith</strong> - seriously?</li>
<li><strong>Transformers</strong> - awesome action movie, but it ranks #3 on the list ahead of <strong>The Matrix, Aliens</strong> and countless other classics. No way, Jose.</li>
<li><strong>Iron Man</strong> - guess what was #1 on the list? Yes, this year&#8217;s comic book action movie. As good as it was, there is no way I would list it on the top 30 sci-fi movies of all time. What a way to damage the integrity of your list, Yahoo!</li>
</ul>
<p>Again, in all fairness, two-thirds of their list probably deserve to be on there, but there are some notable films missing, such as:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>2001: A Space Oddysey</strong></li>
<li><strong>A Clockwork Orange</strong></li>
<li><strong>Children of Men</strong></li>
<li><strong>Dark City</strong></li>
<li><strong>Independence Day</strong> (if you&#8217;re going the popular route)</li>
<li><strong>Minority Report</strong></li>
<li><strong>Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country</strong></li>
<li><strong>Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan</strong></li>
<li><strong>Unbreakable</strong></li>
<li><strong>Wall-E</strong></li>
<li><strong>Blade Runner</strong></li>
<li><strong>The Thing</strong></li>
<li><strong>Invasion of the Body Snatchers</strong> (how many remakes has this inspired?)</li>
<li><strong>The Iron Giant</strong></li>
<li><strong>Planet of the Apes</strong></li>
<li><strong>Galaxy Quest</strong></li>
<li><strong>Total Recall</strong></li>
<li><strong>Mad Max</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>And the list goes on&#8230; This has inspired me to do my own list, which I will release sometime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/16/top-30-sci-fi-films-according-to-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/16/top-30-sci-fi-films-according-to-yahoo/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Bolt and Twilight Move in for the Kill</title>
		<link>http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~r/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves/~3/366705339/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/16/bolt-and-twilight-move-in-for-the-kill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bolt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[harry potter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[release date]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/16/bolt-and-twilight-move-in-for-the-kill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the devastating hole left by the retreat of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Disney&#8217;s Bolt and Summit&#8217;s Twilight have moved into feast on the potential box office dollars left behind. The movies - both of which aim at younger audiences (Bolt at considerably younger) - had been staying clear of the coveted November [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3178/" title="Twilight Movie"><img src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/twilight-movie.jpg" alt="Twilight Movie" /></a>In the devastating hole left by the retreat of <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2276/"><strong>Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince</strong></a>, Disney&#8217;s <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3028/"><strong>Bolt</strong> </a>and Summit&#8217;s <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3178/"><strong>Twilight</strong> </a>have moved into feast on the potential box office dollars left behind. The movies - both of which aim at younger audiences (<strong>Bolt</strong> at considerably younger) - had been staying clear of the coveted November 21 release date out of respect - or -fear of the sixth <strong>Harry Potter</strong> flick. With announcement that that highly anticipated film was being <strong><a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/harry-potter-6-release-date-pushed-back-to-2010/">pushed back to summer 2009</a></strong>, the coveted date was scooped up by the two films, which now look to take advantage of Thanksgiving weekend to earn some extra dough.</p>
<p>This is a good opportunity for <strong>Twilight</strong>, which is based on an allegedly popular book series about a normal girl (the gorgeous Kristin Stewart) who likes to screw around with vampires. OK, to be fair, she&#8217;s monogamous and prefers to share her time with just one vampire (Robert Pattison, who actually lays claim to being the first profound death in the <strong>Harry Potter</strong> franchise), but you get the point. There&#8217;s certainly some buzz around the picture, but having known nothing about the story other than what Summit&#8217;s marketing reps tell me, I don&#8217;t really see the big deal.</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t think <strong>Twilight</strong> is going to be the massive picture that some expect it to be. It&#8217;s definitely going to get a boost from the Thanksgiving weekend, but is it going to be a valid replacement for <strong>Harry Potter</strong>? No. The &#8220;franchise&#8221; doesn&#8217;t have the same name recognition that made <strong>Harry Potter</strong> so successful, and while it looks decent, it doesn&#8217;t look that much different than a dozen other teeny bopper horror movies that have come before it. General audiences aren&#8217;t going to be that motivated to go see this one, except for a lack of other entertainment.</p>
<p>Only time shall tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/16/bolt-and-twilight-move-in-for-the-kill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/16/bolt-and-twilight-move-in-for-the-kill/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>New Body of Lies Movie Trailer Better Than the First</title>
		<link>http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~r/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves/~3/365865215/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/15/new-body-of-lies-movie-trailer-better-than-the-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Videos/Trailers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[body of lies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[crowe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dicaprio]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movie trailer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/15/new-body-of-lies-movie-trailer-better-than-the-first/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just watched the new movie trailer for Body of Lies, the action-drama starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Russell Crowe (directed by Ridley Scott), and it&#8217;s a lot better than the original that I saw in theaters a month or two back. That first trailer implied that the movie could be good while trying its hardest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/body-of-lies-picture.jpg" title="Body of Lies Movie Picture"><img src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/body-of-lies-picture.jpg" alt="Body of Lies Movie Picture" /></a>I just watched the new movie trailer for <strong>Body of Lies</strong>, the action-drama starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Russell Crowe (directed by Ridley Scott), and it&#8217;s a lot better than the original that I saw in theaters a month or two back. That first trailer implied that the movie could be good while trying its hardest to prove otherwise; this new one is much more focused and developed.</p>
<p><strong>Body of Lies</strong>, about a spy in the Middle East (DiCaprio) who finds himself on the outside when his handler (Crowe) goes over the edge, looks to have plenty of action and, of course, terrific acting. Of course, following the flop that was <strong>The Kingdom</strong>, will this one earn some bucks?</p>
<p>Watch the <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/3021/trailers/"><strong>Body of Lies movie trailer</strong></a> here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/15/new-body-of-lies-movie-trailer-better-than-the-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/15/new-body-of-lies-movie-trailer-better-than-the-first/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Haunting of Molly Hartley Trailer Haunts Me</title>
		<link>http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~r/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves/~3/365279106/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/haunting-of-molly-hartley-trailer-haunts-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Videos/Trailers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[haunting of molly hartley]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[horror movie]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movie trailer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/haunting-of-molly-hartley-trailer-haunts-me/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has anyone watched the movie trailer for The Haunting of Molly Hartley yet? It comes out on October 31, 2008, but, frankly, does it matter? This movie does not look good at all. The movie trailer is plagued with cliches, and, more importantly, it&#8217;s as boring as Hell. The lack of engaging music or even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone watched the movie trailer for <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3208/"><strong>The Haunting of Molly Hartley</strong></a> yet? It comes out on October 31, 2008, but, frankly, does it matter? This movie does not look good at all. The movie trailer is plagued with cliches, and, more importantly, it&#8217;s as boring as Hell. The lack of engaging music or even an attempt to do something clever with the presentation (think of the camera flash technique used to advertise <strong>The Texas Chainsaw Massacre</strong>) absolutely kills its chances at being successful. The entire plot is revealed in the two-minute trailer, which seems to drag on for five.</p>
<p>Seriously, I don&#8217;t even think Halloween can save this one.</p>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ve9MBj1AGHg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ve9MBj1AGHg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/haunting-of-molly-hartley-trailer-haunts-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/haunting-of-molly-hartley-trailer-haunts-me/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Inglorious Bastards is Actually… Austin Powers 4?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~r/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves/~3/365257291/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/inglorious-bastards-is-actually-austin-powers-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[austin powers 4]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[inglorious bastards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mike myers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/inglorious-bastards-is-actually-austin-powers-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino is an interesting fellow. Known for some of the most unique and ambitious films of the last two decades, Tarantino has directed some of the grittiest and most clever movies of recent memory. Word has been buzzing around the recent news of the arrival of Inglorious Bastards, a WWII film that has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/austin-powers.jpg" title="Austin Powers 4 Picture"><img src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/austin-powers.jpg" alt="Austin Powers 4 Picture" /></a>Quentin Tarantino is an interesting fellow. Known for some of the most unique and ambitious films of the last two decades, Tarantino has directed some of the grittiest and most clever movies of recent memory. Word has been buzzing around the recent news of the arrival of <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1580/"><strong>Inglorious Bastards</strong></a>, a WWII film that has been floating around for years with no development news, et cetera. But just over the last month or so, it has been announced that Tarantino has completed the script and has recruited a fine bunch of actors - led by Brad Pitt - to helm the project.</p>
<p>Or has he? Word has it that Tarantino has actually not been working on his long anticipated <strong>Inglorious Bastards</strong> flick, and instead is in charge of the yet-to-be-named <strong>Austin Powers 4</strong>.Given the so-so results of the last <strong>Austin Powers</strong> film, and the decline in Mike Myers&#8217; star power, Tarantino was brought on to give the franchise a much needed reimaginin, a la <strong>Casino Royale</strong>. Mike Myers is signed on once again to star as the dashing British hero, but there&#8217;s no word if Dr. Evil will return.</p>
<p>Of course, that last paragraph is bullshit. The real story is that Mike Myers has been cast in a small role for <strong>Inglorious Bastards</strong>. But that&#8217;s just not as interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/inglorious-bastards-is-actually-austin-powers-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/inglorious-bastards-is-actually-austin-powers-4/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Potter 6 Release Date Pushed Back to 2010</title>
		<link>http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~r/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves/~3/365249527/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/harry-potter-6-release-date-pushed-back-to-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[half-blood prince]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[harry potter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[release date]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/harry-potter-6-release-date-pushed-back-to-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just kidding&#8230; Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince will not be delayed that much, but to the horror of Harry Potter fans around the world, it was announced today that the movie would indeed be shifted from its November 2008 release date to Summer 2009 - July 17, 2009 to be exact.
Warner Brothers said it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just kidding&#8230; <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2276/"><strong>Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince</strong></a> will not be delayed that much, but to the horror of <strong>Harry Potter</strong> fans around the world, it was announced today that the movie would indeed be shifted from its November 2008 release date to Summer 2009 - July 17, 2009 to be exact.</p>
<p>Warner Brothers said it moved the film to take full advantage of its box office capabilities by releasing it in the summer, though frankly I&#8217;ve always regarded the November releases to be more successful. I can&#8217;t back that up with statistics, but according to today&#8217;s release, the <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1347/"><strong>last Harry Potter</strong></a> movie - which, in my opinion, was by far the worst of the franchise - was the second highest grosser, and it was released in the summer.</p>
<p>Reading between the lines, though, this release date push probably signifies production delays, perhaps from the various strikes and de facto strikes that have ravaged Hollywood over the last year. I can&#8217;t imagine that Warner Brothers would simply sit on a finished <strong>Harry Potter</strong> movie for eight months, as not only would it be denying them hundreds of millions of dollars, but would also be asking for piracy.</p>
<p>As a <strong>Harry Potter</strong> fan, however, I am hugely disappointed that the movie has been pushed back to 2009, especially since Warner Brothers had just started to whet our appetites with teaser trailers and the like. Word is that the planned November 2010 release of Part One of <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3107/"><strong>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows</strong></a> has not been affected by this delay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/harry-potter-6-release-date-pushed-back-to-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/14/harry-potter-6-release-date-pushed-back-to-2010/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: The Scorpion King 2</title>
		<link>http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~r/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves/~3/362254492/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/11/movie-review-the-scorpion-king-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DVD Releases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dvd]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mummy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scorpion king 2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/11/movie-review-the-scorpion-king-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With great reluctance, I offered to review The Scorpion King 2: Rise of a Warrior. A direct-to-DVD release, the action-thriller had very little going for it, but considering the fact that it&#8217;s &#8220;from the producers of The Mummy&#8221; and stars UFC champion Randy Couture, it had to be great, right? Wrong.
The Scorpion King 2: Rise [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scorpion-king-2.jpg" title="Scorpion King 2 DVD"><img src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/scorpion-king-2.jpg" alt="Scorpion King 2 DVD" /></a>With great reluctance, I offered to review <strong>The Scorpion King 2: Rise of a Warrior</strong>. A direct-to-DVD release, the action-thriller had very little going for it, but considering the fact that it&#8217;s &#8220;from the producers of <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/809/"><strong>The Mummy</strong></a>&#8221; and stars UFC champion Randy Couture, it had to be great, right? Wrong.</p>
<p><strong>The Scorpion King 2: Rise of a Warrior</strong> is your pretty typical direct-to-DVD movie, which means it&#8217;s pretty damn bad. While the production values are decent enough for a film like this, you can tell from minute one that this movie was made simply to coincide with the theatrical release of <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2717/"><strong>The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor</strong></a>, though why it isn&#8217;t being released until August 19th is beyond me. Cash was in the mind of Universal Studios - not quality - and it shows throughout the film.</p>
<p>The movie features a young Mathayus (Michael Copon), the character who will grow up to be the Scorpion King as portrayed by Dwayne &#8220;The Rock&#8221; Johnson in <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/810/"><strong>The Mummy Returns</strong></a> and <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1019/"><strong>The Scorpion King</strong></a>. Long after his father is murdered by a ruthless king (Couture) who has magical powers, Mathayus grows up to be a great warrior and vows vengeance - though killing the king is going to be harder than first thought.</p>
<p>The acting is the first thing that clues you into the fact that you&#8217;re watching a cheap production. Copon is pretty bad, and Couture is especially painful to watch. Combined with the clunky screenplay, the actors are barely able to pull off a line without sounding like they&#8217;re reading from a teleprompter. Worse still is that the characters - especially Layla, played by the beautiful Karen David - spit out lines that sound like they were written for an MTV reality show; rather modern-sounding jokes and interchange really kill the mood, if there ever was one to begin with.</p>
<p>The action isn&#8217;t anything to scream about, and that&#8217;s assuming you have the patience to make it to the action. At an hour and 49 minutes, <strong>The Scorpion King 2</strong> feels overly long, and while there are plenty of action sequences, they are all relatively small and unimpressive. I could only watch 20 minutes at a time before turning it off to shift my attention to something much more interesting, like preliminary trials in the Olympics.</p>
<p>Basically, there&#8217;s no love to be had for <strong>The Scorpion King 2: Rise of a Warrior</strong>. Despite the fact that it&#8217;s directed by the guy who did <strong>Highlander</strong>, the movie lacks action, excitement and, more importantly, quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/11/movie-review-the-scorpion-king-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/11/movie-review-the-scorpion-king-2/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A Crazy Couple of Weeks in the World</title>
		<link>http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~r/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves/~3/360490321/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/09/a-crazy-couple-of-weeks-in-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[olympic stabbing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/09/a-crazy-couple-of-weeks-in-the-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the world coming to? It has been a crazy couple of weeks in the world, with some stunning sports developments, hideous murders, new wars and more. Not all of the news has been bad, but when it has, it hasn&#8217;t been crazy.
The Olympics kicked off on Friday in stunning fashion, with a spectacular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/olympics-beijing.jpg" title="Olympics Beijing"><img src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/olympics-beijing.jpg" alt="Olympics Beijing" /></a>What is the world coming to? It has been a crazy couple of weeks in the world, with some stunning sports developments, hideous murders, new wars and more. Not all of the news has been bad, but when it has, it hasn&#8217;t been crazy.</p>
<p>The Olympics kicked off on Friday in stunning fashion, with a spectacular opening ceremony by the Chinese. We all knew they were not to be outdone, and it may be some time before we see something as grandious as the $300-million production that featured countless fireworks, amazing video screens that seemed to come out of everywhere, artistic performances that would be unimaginable in any other part of the world (how many performers were there in the ceremonies, altogether?), and so on and so forth. I absolutely love the Olympics, and am happy they are here. It&#8217;s the only time I watch so many diverse sports and actually get into them all - I&#8217;m watching USA vs. Japan women&#8217;s volleyball, and the Japanese are looking good (against a supposedly better U.S. team). I&#8217;m actually looking forward to basketball (go Redeem Team!) despite my lack of general interest in the sport, as well as gymnastics and a variety of others. There are going to be hours of lost productivity over the next couple of weeks.</p>
<p>I try to watch the Olympics on CBC, the Canadian channel, rather than NBC, where they seem more content to bring up politics and conflict in a passive aggressive kind of way toward any country they choose to ridicule. Not too mention that they show less sports (on the main channel) and more commercials. Of course, it was classic seeing President Bush glance at his watch halfway through the opening ceremonies. seemingly bored out of his mind.</p>
<p>Of course, the Olympics have been scarred by a series of events, not exactly the seamless launch China was so desperately hoping for. In the days preceding, China was attacked by a small rebel force - a rarity for the country. Beyond that, though, they had little control over a seemingly deranged man stabbing the parents of a former U.S. Olympian just miles from the Games, killing one and seriously injuring the other before jumping to his death, or the suddenly profound Russian vs. Georgia war, where thousands have already died. So much for an Olympic truce, and the timing seems more like convenience than coincidental, as the Games have attracted so many heads of state to Beijing.</p>
<p>Beyond war, reporters have been busy the last few weeks, especially in North America. It was announced to day that Bernie Mac has died - while I was never a big fan of the comedian, it was definitely a bit of a shocker. While both <strong>Pineapple Express</strong> and <strong>Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants 2</strong> beat out <strong>The Dark Knight</strong> on Wednesday, it looks like the <strong>Batman</strong> movie will once again conquer the weekend box office. More importantly, we&#8217;ve seen the mysterious Anthrax case that, in its outset, caused paranoia throughout the United States, to come to a close with the suicide of the FBI&#8217;s only suspect. Questions remain, but unless we&#8217;re looking at a major government cover up, the late scientist seems like he was a troubled man. Beyond that, Canada and the U.S. has been captivated by the absolutely disturbing stabbing/decapitation/cannibalizing of an innocent, random victim on a bus, by a man who no one - even his wife - would have predicted.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said, it&#8217;s been a crazy couple of weeks in the world, and there were several other stories not mentioned here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/09/a-crazy-couple-of-weeks-in-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/09/a-crazy-couple-of-weeks-in-the-world/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Rachel Getting Married Movie Trailer - Any Good?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.filmjabber.com/~r/EriksMovieReviewsAndOtherRantsAndRaves/~3/358916864/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/07/rachel-getting-married-movie-trailer-any-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Videos/Trailers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[anne hathaway]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movie trailer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rachel getting married]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/07/rachel-getting-married-movie-trailer-any-good/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched the Rachel Getting Married movie trailer the other day. Pretty good, but not great. I&#8217;m starting to believe more and more that Anne Hathaway has potential to be a pretty good actress, but I still have a bit of trouble taking her seriously (even though she has had serious roles in the past, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3244/"><strong>Rachel Getting Married</strong></a> movie trailer the other day. Pretty good, but not great. I&#8217;m starting to believe more and more that Anne Hathaway has potential to be a pretty good actress, but I still have a bit of trouble taking her seriously (even though she has had serious roles in the past, she is best known for &#8220;fluffier&#8221; films). Perhaps this indie role will help change my viewpoint.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the movie trailer for <strong>Rachel Getting Married</strong> does not have me clamboring to get to theaters in October. There are some mildly funny bits, but the offputting outcast story has been done better to funnier results. The movie looks like it&#8217;s going to be more of a drama than a comedy, which is fine, but it seems like the studio thinks that there are more laughs then there actually are. That could spell trouble.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the <strong>Rachel Getting Married</strong> movie trailer for your perusal:</p>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1wDDgSwEo1s&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1wDDgSwEo1s&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/07/rachel-getting-married-movie-trailer-any-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/08/07/rachel-getting-married-movie-trailer-any-good/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
